Showing posts with label tongue-in-cheek. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tongue-in-cheek. Show all posts
Saturday, October 25, 2014
Presuppositional Atheism?
Once upon
a time, not so long ago, I was a Presuppositionalist. I've discussed this
briefly before, but having grown wary and suspect of the weaknesses of
apologetic methods like Thomistic arguments and evidentialism, I turned to the
seemingly-unassailable circularity offered by this “epistemology.” I just used scare quotes there because
Presuppositionalism probably isn’t as much of an epistemology as it is an apologetic
method (if it’s even that). The basic claim of Presuppositionalism is that the
Christian understanding of reality is the only internally consistent worldview
and that the propositions contained in the Protestant Bible, and implicitly the Westminsterian interpretation of those propositions, are to be taken axiomatically.
All other worldviews will fail the internal scrutiny of a reductio ad absurdum.
Monday, April 8, 2013
I've been such a fool
Many will be familiar with Psalm 14:1
and, of course, since my apostasy I've had it quoted to me. After reflecting on
this verse a bit, I now think the people who say the godless are fools
may be right after all.
One of the reasons often bandied about to explain why brilliant scientists and other egghead professor types try to push their secular agendas in fields like anthropology, sociology, archeology, biology, psychology, cosmology, geology and other areas that can make claims that run counter to sacred texts is that these folks are just trying to convince themselves and everybody else that there is no God. They desperately don’t want there to be a God and the reason they and other non-theists don’t want there to be a God is really quite simple. They don’t want to have to feel like any divine judge can hold them accountable for all their vile wickedness. That’s the whole motivation behind secular humanism and atheism, right?
One of the reasons often bandied about to explain why brilliant scientists and other egghead professor types try to push their secular agendas in fields like anthropology, sociology, archeology, biology, psychology, cosmology, geology and other areas that can make claims that run counter to sacred texts is that these folks are just trying to convince themselves and everybody else that there is no God. They desperately don’t want there to be a God and the reason they and other non-theists don’t want there to be a God is really quite simple. They don’t want to have to feel like any divine judge can hold them accountable for all their vile wickedness. That’s the whole motivation behind secular humanism and atheism, right?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)